In 2011 Israeli TV released a video near Easter which explicitly blasphemed and mocked the crucifixion of Christ, saying, “Yeshu [Jesus] was an enemy of the Jewish people. He attempted to convert us all into Christians.”
Jesus, according to the video, wanted the Jews to assimilate with the Goyim, and to assimilate “means to get [f-up] with the goyah.” In the process, a puppet monkey is crucified on the cross saying things like,
“I’m scared! I walked on water, I transformed crickets into cake! I am not Yeshu! This is a mistake!”
Imagine the outcry if a goyim attempts to slightly mimic this video clip. Remember the outcry when Mel Gibson’sThe Passion of the Christ came out?
After movie was released, Charles Patterson blamed all the horrors of Jewish suffering on the gospels’ accounts. Patterson writes:
“The trouble with Mel Gibson’s film ‘The Passion’ is not the film itself, but the gospel story on which it’s based. The gospel story, which has generated more anti-Semitism than the sum of all the other anti-Semitic writings ever written, created the climate in Christian Europe that led to the Holocaust. Long before the rise of Adolf Hitler, the gospel story about the life and death of Jesus had poisoned the bloodstream of European civilization.”
Heinrich Graetz drew the same conclusion more than a century earlier, charging that Christians’ “hatred against Jews” was “derived from the gospels and their theological literature.”
For Jami Bernard of the New York Daily News, Gibson’s Passion was “the most virulently antisemitic movie made since the German propaganda films of World War II.”
Daniel Jonah Goldhagen, author of the fraudulent book Hitler’s Willing Executioners, wrote that “Gibson’s film takes the fetishizing of horror and death that exists within Christianity to some sort of sickly logical conclusion.
Visually, iconographically and symbolically, Gibson’s ‘Passion’ is a sadomasochistic, orgiastic display that demonizes Jews as it degrades those who revel in viewing the horror…
“Its orgy of unsurpassed and virtually unremitting sadism restores this part of the Jesus story—de-emphasized by the Catholic Church since the Vatican II reforms—to center stage, to haunt all those who would follow Jesus with indelible, iconic images of cruelty. Gibson has thus unwittingly exposed the misguidedness of this cult of death.”
William S. Burroughs
Jewish professor Paul Fredriksen declared when the movie came out, “When violence breaks out, Mel Gibson will have a much higher authority than professors and bishops to answer to.”
The Los Angeles Times added that the movie is “a gasoline-soaked rag tossed on the already roaring flames of anti-Semitism.”
Rabbi Tovia Singer was more pessimistic:
“By the time the first nail is hammered into the cross, viewers in Germany will be passing around knife sharpeners in the theater. Israel may have to absorb a massive flight of European Jewry.”
Fredricksen implies that the movie is anti-Semitic, but Fredriksen writes it was the Jews who inspired Pilate to kill Jesus! After reading Fredricksen’s work, Jewish writer David Klinghoffer opined,
“Pilate Killed Jesus. But even Fredriksen allows that it was the priests who tipped him off to the threat posed by the Christian savior—or rather, by those who followed him.”
But according to America’s most popular Rabbi, Shmuley Boteach, “It was the Romans, and solely the Romans, who put Jesus to death,” [but] “it was the Christians who crucified him. They made him the very fountain of anti-Semitism.”
Gibson, according to Boteach, is “a rancid anti-Semitic bigot!” Boteach made those comments even before the movie came out! This had baffled even Jeremy Gerard of New York Magazine. When Boteach asked the question, “where are the Hollywood celebrities to condemn the film?,” Gerard responded, “Waiting to see it, perhaps?”
Gibson even had to delete scenes such as “his blood be upon us and upon our children,” but that was not good enough for Boteach. Gibson, who “could not get backing from the Hollywood studios,” had to get the money somewhere else: his own pocket.
“After early accusations of anti-Semitism, it became difficult for Gibson to find an American distribution company. 20th Century Fox had a first-look deal with Icon and passed on the film in response to public protests.”
Let us entertain the thought that the Passion of the Christ is anti-Semitic, as Boteach and others claimed. What are we going to do with movies such as You’re Next (2011), Eli Roth’s The Last Exorcism(2010), and countless others?
Is Boteach at least willing to bear some responsibility? Shouldn’t we hold Cronenberg, Stuart Gordon, Darren Aronofsky, and a host of others responsible for deconstructing what art is supposed to be? Shouldn’t they be held responsible for mocking what people consider to be sacrilegious?
You are a premillenial dispensationalist and believe in this rapture stuff? Welcome to Rapture-Palooza. You are a Catholic? Welcome to Frank Miller’s Sin City (2005), Monsignor (1982), Agnes of God(1985), Rosemary’s Baby (1968), and a host of others.
You are a Muslim and have nothing to do with terrorist activity? Welcome to the Iron Man movie series, Dark Knight Rises, and a host of others. Your country will more than likely be mentioned as a terrorist cell.
You’re a decent German have nothing to do with Nazi Germany? Welcome to Captain America, Inglorious Basterds, etc.
You’re a Russian? Welcome to Kick Ass 2 and Salt. You are an Israeli? Well, your country will be portrayed as an ally to the United States and beacon of light in much of the Western world and the Middle East in movies such as Delta Force, featuring Chuck Norris.
In short, Hollywood, the ministry of propaganda, has something for each and every one of us.
The crux of those movies is that terrorism and covert activity can only come from countries in the Middle East and in Russia. They never even remotely suggest that Jewish revolutionaries, since the time of Bar Kokhba, play an astronomical role in spreading terrorism in much of the world for thousands of years.
But if you produce just one movie about how the crucifixion was a joint effort between the Jews and Pilate, you are then a rabid anti-Semite!
THE ISRAELI REGIME IS THE REAL ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM
In a nutshell, in the psychological war, anything that will distract the enemy and perceptive and articulate observers from seeing the real elephant in the room is permissible.
Let us suppose for example that ninety percent of Americans stay away from Hollywood propaganda for just three months and concentrate on how the Israeli regime has wrapped America around a neo-Bolshevik plan, certainly there would be a huge change in foreign policy because the vast majority of Americans would be able to see that the Zionist regime can and is willing to suspend any law, including international law, in order to marshal their Mephistophelian agendas in the Middle East. Just recently,
“The Obama administration waived provisions of a federal law which ban the supply of weapons and money to terrorists. The move is opening doors to supplying Syrian opposition with protection from chemical weapons.
“The Arms Export Control Act (AECA) allows the US president to waive provisions in Sections 40 and 40A, which forbid providing munitions, credit and licenses to countries supporting acts of terrorism. But those prohibitions can be waived “if the President determines that the transaction is essential to the national security interests of the United States.”
The Zionist regime suspends the rule of law in order to support terrorists! That’s not worse than stupid—that’s hellish. Obama is not that stupid. He is just being used as a master puppet to fulfill the Zionist dream of heaven on earth, since we know for certain that the Israeli regime controls American foreign policy. Scholar and former CIA official Paul R. Pillar writes,
“The Israeli government may have the deciding vote on the matter before Congress [strike on Syria], not so much because it appears to have been the source of intelligence that the Obama administration is relying on to make a case tying the chemical incident two weeks ago to the Assad regime (although there are interesting questions to be raised about that) but because members of Congress anticipating their next re-election campaign will be thinking about what type of vote Benjamin Netanyahu’s government desires, a criterion that routinely gets equated in American political discourse with ‘support for Israel.’”
Obama and the neo-Bolsheviks keep talking about a limited strike, but no one has been able to tell us how a military and aggressive strike against a sovereign nation can be “limited.”
Moreover, no one has been able to explain how the Zionist regime can invade a sovereign country while the majority of people in the same country, including university students, do not accept a military strike. As Pillar articulates,
“Neither the administration nor anyone else has adequately explained how this can be assured if subsequent escalation or retaliation from the other side follows a U.S. strike. As California Republican Ed Royce observed in a hearing of the House Foreign Affairs Committee Wednesday, “the Assad regime would have a say in what happens next.”
What is even more outrageous is that when Russia presented a 1000-page document concluding that it was the rebels, not Assad, who actually used chemical weapons, the Zionist regime in America declared otherwise—with not a single evidence to the contrary.
As Pillar further explains,
“Does the United States want to follow its powerful and privileged Israeli client on a path that not only brushes aside international law, international organization, and the peaceful pursuit of international objectives but also entails perpetual warfare, much isolation, and all of the costs and risks that go with that?”
Pillar suggests in his conclusion that when a “game works well for Netanyahu,” more than likely the same game “is awful” for the United States.
How ironic that it is Russia, not the United States or Britain, that is forcing the West to take the path of peace in Syria. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov had even thought about forcing “foes of Syrian President Bashar-al-Assad to attend an international peace conference instead of urging them to do so”! What does Russia get in return?
“US Senators have urged the Obama administration to freeze assets of three major Russian banks, ban their activities in the US, and deny employees’ entry into the country on the suspicion they are doing business with the Assad regime.”
CRIMES COMMITTED BY ZIONISM KEEP PILING UP
We have already seen that the Saudis sent death-row inmates in Syria to overthrow Assad.
Now we are learning that Al-Qaeda and sections of the Syrian rebels/terrorists are recruiting soldiers from other places such as Iraq. Since the past two months, hundreds of prisoners from the notorious Abu Ghraib have been let go, and the rebels are making use of those people.
“On July 21, Islamic militants used suicide bombers to blow their way into Abu Ghraib’s prison, releasing close to 500 convicts, many of whom were senior members of Al Qaeda. According to Jessica Lewis from the Institute for the Study of War, a public policy think tank that provides defense analysis, the prison rescue was the last operation of a year-long campaign called ‘Breaking the Walls,’ in which Al Qaeda members sprung jails in and around Iraq, and as a result, have ‘significantly increased the operational depth of the organization.’
“The campaign was orchestrated by Abu Bakr al Baghdadi, the leader of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIS), which along with Jabhat al Nusra, has become a major Al Qaeda faction within the Syrian opposition.” 
Despite all of that, Stephen Rapp, U.S. war-crimes ambassador, raps that Assad should be trialed for his crime against humanity.
Assad should accept that challenge.
Let us further suppose that Assad did use chemical weapons and was responsible for killing innocent civilians. Assad should propose that Bush, Obama, Perle, Veith, and nearly all the neoconservatives should be trialed for creating chaos in the Middle East and for slaughtering millions of civilians.
Even former Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates declares that for Obama to attack Syria is like “throwing gasoline on an extremely complex fire in the Middle East.”
Israel ambassador Michael Oren has recently brought some light into the Syrian situation by saying that Israel has privately wanted to remove Assad since the war began. Oren unequivocally declares,
“The initial message about the Syrian issue was that we always wanted Bashar Assad to go, we always preferred the bad guys [Al Qaida] who weren’t backed by Iran to the bad guys who were backed by Iran.
“The greatest danger to Israel is by the strategic arc that extends from Tehran, to Damascus to Beirut. And we saw the Assad regime as the keystone in that arc.” Oren is optimistic about the future of Jews in America because they will be “committed and attached to Israel.”
Assad should also ask that the Israeli regime be trialed for mass murder in Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Libya, etc. The neo-Bolsheviks in America should be trialed for eradicating the Christian population in Syria, for allowing the NSA to spy on far-distant countries such as Austria, for continuing to disregard the vast majority of Americans and Europeans who reject a Syria invasion, and for creating economic havoc in the U.S. and in much of Europe.
Just last year, it has been reported that the U.S. spent $25 billion in Afghanistan, and all that money was largely wasted on what the Zionists wanted to do, and no one can actually know for sure where all the money went.
What a coincidence that Jonas E. Alexis also happens to be 34 years old.
Finally, the Zionist war machine should be trialed for telling a Swat team, “one of the first teams of heavily armed police to respond to Monday’s shooting in Washington,” to “stand down” during the recent mass shooting.
The story behind Aaron Alexis gets even more complicated when Bloomberg declares that the “U.S. government contractor that vetted Edward Snowden” performed background checks on Alexis.
Moreover, “Alexis had a secret-level clearance that would have enabled him to get an access card needed to get on the base.” Senator Claire McCaskill of Missouri suddenly had a political awakening:
“From Edward Snowden to Aaron Alexis, what’s emerging is a pattern of failure on the part of this company[Providence Equity Parners], and a failure of this entire system, that risks nothing less than our national security and the lives of Americans.
“What’s most frightening is that USIS performs a majority of background checks for our government. We clearly need a top-to-bottom overhaul of how we vet those who have access to our country’s secrets and to our secure facilities. I plan to pursue such an overhaul, and won’t rest until it’s achieved. ”
The same company was under criminal investigation last June.
Let us further entertain the Zionist position that Assad is responsible for the deaths of 100,000 people—although the claim is completely bogus. They will never take even one responsibility for their own chaos precisely because it goes back to what Maurice Samuel said a number of years ago.