Welcome to Zionism…Now Bend Over (Part I)
“American Evangelicals made common cause with the Jewish community in the United States, and they seemed to care little if at all for the opinions or the sufferings of their fellow-Christians in the ancient Churches of the Middle East. Israeli politicians have not been slow to exploit this political windfall, caring little for the fact that Evangelical apocalypticism expected the conversion of the Jews to Christianity.”—Oxford church historian Diarmaid MacCulloch
David R. Francis
Dutch diplomat Oudendyke wrote to former Prime Minister Arthur Balfour in 1918 saying,
“Bolshevism is the greatest issue now before the world, not even excluding the war which is still raging, and unless, as above stated, Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to spread in one form or another over Europe and the whole world, as it is organized and worked by Jews, who have no nationality and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things.”
In the same vein, David R. Francis, U.S. ambassador to Moscow, declared that “the Bolshevik leaders here, most of whom are Jews and 90 percent of whom are retuned exiles, care little for Russia or any other country but are internationalists, and they are trying to start a worldwide social revolution.”
What Oudendyke and Francis ended up saying was that Bolshevism, given enough time, would have literally reduced Russia to ashes. Moreover, if Russia had been destroyed, Germany would have been one of the first countries that the Bolsheviks would have invaded. In fact,
“Lenin, Trotsky and the other Bolsheviks made no secret of the fact that they were intent on starting a universal revolution, to be exported through a defeated Germany; they boasted that they had already sent agents out to prepare for the ground and organize revolt.”
Lenin and the Bolsheviks meant business. French Foreign Minister Stephen Pichon told British Ambassador in Paris Lord Derby in 1918 that
“he and the government were very much disturbed by certain information that they had got from Germany as to that Country being on the eve of a revolution. He says that they are as full of Bolshevism as Russia itself was before the Revolution, and it may break out at any time.
“They have got a Provisional Committee which he says is practically a Provisional Government actually established with its Headquarters in the Russian Embassy at Berlin. In fact he says the position is exactly the same there as it was before Kerensky brought off the Russian Revolution. What frightens him is the fact, as he says, that Bolshevism is very contagious and he is evidently considerably alarmed as to what may happen in this country [France].”
In short, Nazi Germany was largely a reaction to Bolshevism and Jewish revolutionary activity, and the word peace was simply out of the Bolshevik vocabulary. Setting the world on fire by revolutionary means was one of their unspoken goals.
One newspaper in Germany for example charged that Jewish revolutionaries such as Rosa Luxemburg “want to demolish and destroy everything that dares to oppose them, with lies, slander and violence.” This was not without evidence.
The marriage between Bolshevism and Zionism is not far-fetched at all. In the summer of 2011, Polish Jewish sociologist Zygmunt Bauman, who was a former Communist during World War II and former lecturer at Tel Aviv University, made this statement:
“Israeli politicians are terrified of peace. They tremble with fear from the possibility of peace, because without war and without general mobilization they don’t know how to live.”
If you think that Bauman was just pulling your leg, think again. When Golda Meir was asked by former British journalist Alan Hart the puzzling question as to whether Israel was willing to take the world down if it happens to be threatened, Meir responded, “Yes, that’s exactly what I am saying.”
“Implicit in what Golda said was that Israel, in a doomsday situation, would be prepared to use its nuclear weapons in a defiant farewell gesture.”
If you think again that Meyer was just speaking metaphorically, just pick up the Israeli newspaper Haaretz and read some of their headlines: “Cabinet OKs Demolishing Bedouin Village, Replacing with Jewish Town.”
Moreover, pay attention to Benjamin Netanyahu’s rage about the U.S. trying to strike a peace deal with Iran. When the West failed reach a peace deal, Netanyahu was more than happy.
Before the West even started the peace talk, Netanyahu declared,
“Iran got the deal of the century and the international community got a bad deal, this is a very bad deal. Israel utterly rejects it. Israel is not obliged by this agreement and Israel will do everything it needs to defend itself and the security of its people.”
For Netanyahu, Iran must halt all its uranium, despite the fact that the National Intelligence Estimate had already abandoned the thesis that Iran was and is building nuclear weapons.
Here’s the kicker: Iran even “signs agreement with IAEA to allow broader inspections of nuclear sites.” But all of that means nothing to Netanyahu. Instead, he urged all Jews in North America to get behind him on Iran.But J. J. Goldberg of the Jewish Daily Forward was not impressed with Netanyahu’s hawkish demands:
“It’s worth noting that Israeli leaders have a long tradition of plying American Jewish activists with extreme, often exaggerated depictions of the threats Israel faces in order to maximize the pressure the alarmed activists will then exert on Washington on Israel’s behalf.”
Then Goldberg added this damning statement:
“The likely effect of Netanyahu’s appeal to the federation leaders was to display not resolute leadership, but panic. Applause was light during most of the speech, and standing ovations, a standard gesture during this sort of appearance, were entirely absent except the obligatory one at the end.”
Zionism, given enough time, will reduce the West and the Middle East into ashes —unless Western politicians have the nerve to declare an ideological war on the entire movement. I say the entire movement because even the smallest Zionist organization directly or indirectly seeks to destroy what the West actually stands for.
For example, Israeli Michael Lucas, “one of the world’s wealthiest gay porn producers,” used Frontpage Magazine, a neoconservative cell headed by David Horowitz, to pour his acerbic pronouncements on the Palestinians. Lucas declared,
“I hate Muslims absolutely.”
In order to attack Muslims, Lucas produced a video called Men of Israel, “which became a vehicle for his gay tours, featured two actors having sex inside a Palestinian village that was ethnically cleansed by Zionist militias in 1948.” Journalist Max Blumenthal of The Nation writes,
“Incorrectly claiming that the village had been depopulated hundreds of years before, Lucas wrote in a press release, ‘We went to an abandoned village just north of Jerusalem. It was a beautiful, ancient township that had been deserted centuries ago…however, that did not stop our guys from mounting each other and trying to repopulate it. Biology may not be the lesson of the day, but these men shot their seeds all over the village.’
“After the filming concluded in the ‘abandoned’ village, Lucas and his cast were received by a news crew from Israel’s Channel 1, which covered the porn shoot as a boon to Israeli public relations”
Lucas moved on to say that the Koran is “today’s Mein Kampf.” But when he was speaking at Stanford, he declared,
“I never in my life said or wrote a bad word about Arabs–go read any of my articles. My criticism was always addressed towards the religion and ideology of Islam. So I would like to ask Stanford students not to exploit the word ‘racism’ at their own convenience.”
Born in Russia to a Jewish family, Lucas called the country “the putrid country of my birth” and Jimmy Carter “the fucking peanut farmer”—obviously because Carter is the author of Palestine: Peace not Apartheid.
Lucas, like Sheldon Adelson, seemed to suggest that he should have been born in Israel: “I stand with Israel, I stand with Jews.”
According to Lucas, Republicans are “homophobic and anti-Semitic.” But this is the man that FrontPage Magazine decided to give a platform for Israel. No doubt that CBS News called Lucas “Gay Porn’s Neocon Kingpin.”
FrontPage Magazine has been shown again and again to be a Zionist cell when it attacks Diarmaid MacCulloch, an Oxford historian, for reporting that Christians are routinely persecuted in the Middle East—and Israel is an accomplice. MacCulloch writes,
“My interview with His Holiness Moran Mor Ignatius Zakka I Iwas, Syriac Orthodox Patriarch of Antioch and All the East, at his Church’s fine new seminary buildings in the hills outside Damascus. Before he would say anything else, the venerable Patriarch fixed me with a stern stare and told me to tell all Western Christians of the desperate plight which now faced the Christians of the Middle East.
“And that was when Syria was still one of the few countries in the Middle East where Christian Churches were strong and respected communities, taking their full part in national life. Elsewhere, things were desperate; and now they are in Syria too: Christians are scapegoated for their faith by an extremist militant minority of Muslims, who betray their own religion by intolerance, and who make other Muslims ashamed of what is happening.
“I did my best to honour the Patriarch’s message, and since then, I have written a great deal about silence in Christianity—good silences and also the bad ones, which dishonour Christian faith. It was difficult to fit them all into my book, Silence: A Christian History; and one of the silences which I find most frustrating is precisely the lack of noise from Western Christians about the fate of ancient Christianities in the Middle East.
“At the heart of the problems in the Middle East is seven decades of unresolved conflict between Israel and Palestine, and I notice that when American politicians discuss those matters, they seem to assume that all Palestinians, and indeed all Arabs, are Muslims. Not so: there are Christians there too, like the Syriac Orthodox Patriarch.
“They are the first Christians; once they were the future of Christianity, rather than the Churches of the West, Catholics, Protestants or even Orthodox (because those whom we Westerners call Orthodox Christians officially regard most of the Eastern Churches as Unorthodox!). Why this blindness, why this silence?”
MacCulloch hit nail right in the head when he said,
“The problem is a Protestant one, going right back to sixteenth-century Reformation. From Martin Luther onwards, many Protestants have eagerly been awaiting an imminent end to the world, the return of Christ in glory.
“ Reading the Bible, it’s easy to link this to the idea that a necessary precondition for Christ to return is that his ancient people the Jews convert to the Christian faith; and so many Protestants have sought the right conditions for that to happen.
“It was one of the reasons that the Puritan statesman Oliver Cromwell agreed to the readmission of the Jews to England in the 1650s, after more than three centuries of expulsion; so the English could convert them. But by the nineteenth century there was a further thought: the Jews must return to their Promised Land of Israel. In 1846 there was founded a worldwide Evangelical Alliance.
“One of its main concerns was to return Jews to Palestine and convert them there; German and British Evangelicals even backed the setting-up of a new Anglican bishopric in Jerusalem to provide for the conversion (the first bishop was indeed a converted Jewish rabbi). This was an unprecedentedly practical attempt to hasten on the Last Days, that recurrent Protestant preoccupation.
“The Evangelical Alliance found many other battles to fight as new threats to the Evangelical world-view repeatedly emerged, but its first close association with Jerusalem projects was a precocious sign that international Evangelical Protestantism was going to link itself to the fate of the land of Palestine, even before many Jews began to share that concern.”
How does Daniel Greenfield of FronPage Magazine respond to MacCulloch’s article? It is a “crazy attack,” he said.
“Diarmaid MacCulloch knows his thesis is nonsense, which is why [he] dances from premise to premise leaving a huge gap in the middle. After writing briefly about the plight of Christians, he skips over to the usual “Evangelical Christians are just waiting for Armageddon” rant without really connecting it to his premise.”
The head of the Catholic Church in Israel finally said enough is enough when Israel demolished “a church-owned property …”
Keep in mind that the Bolsheviks only cared about the survival of Bolshevism and nothing else. Now listen to Abraham Foxman of the ADL when he seems to realize that America is not going to invade Syria any time soon: “It causes me to lose sleep.”
In the same vein, AIPAC made it clear that there would be “no pause, delay or moratorium in our efforts” to ask for new sanctions on Iran. French Jewish legislator went so far as to say that if the French government doesn’t “toughen your positions, Netanyahu will attack Iran.”
According to Foxman, this is a “deep and dangerous change” because the security of Israel is at stake.
Isolationism, reasons Foxman, leads to “the greatest disaster ever to the Jewish people,” and “we are seeing growing indications of a desire for America to retreat from the world once again.”
Zionist puppets such as John McCain and Lindsey Graham espouse similar views. Jewish journalist Jenifer Rubin of theWashington Post also indirectly agreed with Foxman. Jewish neoconservative Frederick Kagan and Bret Stephens propounded the same thing.
It doesn’t occur to Foxman that a bloody war with Syria and Iran will send America into another economic and political disaster. It doesn’t occur to Foxman that more than 11 million Americans are out of jobs. It doesn’t occur to Foxman that Syrian children and refugees are still carrying a heavy burden on their shoulders.
It doesn’t occur to Foxman that the Iraq and Afghanistan invasions already gave the American people a six-trillion dollar bill. It doesn’t occur to Foxman that at least one million veterans got injured in the two wars alone. It doesn’t occur to Foxman that
“Nearly 270,000 brain injuries have been diagnosed by the Defense Department since 2001, most of them were likely sustained in Iraq or Afghanistan. It’s estimated that 1 in 5 veterans of those conflicts have PTSD, a number that reached 300,000 several years ago and is probably much higher now…
“Of the more than 50,000 service members wounded in Iraq and Afghanistan who are considered polytrauma patients, 1,600 have moderate to severe brain injuries, 1,400 are amputees, and 900 were severely burned.”
What is even heart-broken is that many of those who got injured in the army were discharged. In other words, they have no benefit, no employment, nothing.
It doesn’t occur to Foxman that, on average, “22 returning soldiers commit suicide” every single day, and that our precious veterans have been shrinking, despite the fact that the U.S. population has risen exponentially. It doesn’t occur to Foxman that decent folk in Europe and in America are still reaping the economic consequences of Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, etc.